For Brokers, Agents, Underwriters & MGAs

No AI Governance.
No Coverage.

That is where the specialty insurance market is heading, and most agents have never been asked to advise a client on it. Underwriters outside D&O and EPLI rarely think about it at all. Margaret Spence spent decades inside this industry before she built a framework to govern AI. She is not translating governance into insurance language. She already speaks it.

93%

Of firms across the Lloyd's market now have, or are actively building, formal AI governance frameworks, up sharply from a year ago.

Source: Lloyd's Market Association AI Risk Management Survey, April 2026 (39 firms, 60%+ of market stamp capacity)
24 states

Have adopted NAIC AI governance model bulletins. The EU AI Act's high-risk obligations, which explicitly cover insurance risk assessment and pricing, become enforceable August 2, 2026.

Cover of When AI Breaks the Law: AI Governance for Talent Leaders by Margaret Spence
The Tool You Hand Your Clients

The Operational Guide For Your Clients

When AI Breaks the Law: AI Governance for Talent Leaders, by Margaret Spence

Your clients are being asked to prove AI governance to keep their coverage, and most of them do not know where to start. This is the book that walks them through it: what their exposure looks like, what documentation an underwriter will expect, and how to build a defensible program before a claim forces the conversation. Hand it to a client before renewal, use it to open a governance-readiness conversation on a new account, or build it into your agency's client education program.

Why This Is Happening Now

Governance Is Becoming A Condition Of Coverage

This is not a regulatory mandate from a government body. This is the private market, actuaries, underwriters, and risk committees, independently arriving at the exposure regulators are also moving to police. When insurers and regulators agree on what constitutes dangerous AI, your clients have nowhere left to hide, and neither do you if you cannot advise them on it.

Governance Is Table Stakes

The Lloyd's Market Is Building Governance Alongside AI, Not After It

In April 2026, the Lloyd's Market Association surveyed 39 firms representing more than 60% of Lloyd's market stamp capacity. Ninety-three percent now have or are actively developing formal AI governance frameworks. Over 60% mandate human review of AI-generated outputs. Forty-four percent assign governance responsibility to the CTO, and 33% have stood up dedicated AI governance committees. LMA Head of Actuarial and Exposure Management Sanjiv Sharma put it plainly: "AI adoption across the Lloyd's market has accelerated quickly over the past 12 months, but what's encouraging is that governance is being built alongside it, rather than after the fact."

Where The Claims Will Come From

Underwriters Rated Professional Indemnity The Highest-Severity AI Loss Scenario

The LMA's companion survey gathered 144 responses, 94% of them underwriters, on the AI-related loss scenarios most likely to generate claims. Professional Indemnity, the coverage line for losses caused by errors, omissions, or negligent advice, came out on top. When AI is embedded in HR decisions, underwriting, claims handling, or client-facing advice and produces erroneous or discriminatory outputs, that is a PI exposure. Systematic algorithmic errors do not produce one claim. They produce thousands.

Governance As A Condition Of Coverage

Standalone AI Liability Products Now Require Proof Of Governance To Bind

In 2024, Armilla AI became the first Lloyd's coverholder dedicated exclusively to AI liability, backed by Chaucer Group and Axis Capital. By January 2026, its Lloyd's-backed coverage expanded to $25 million as demand outpaced supply, largely because traditional insurers were retreating from the category entirely. To access that coverage, an organization must demonstrate ongoing AI model quality assessments, documented governance frameworks, performance monitoring, and vendor risk management. Testudo, a separate claims-made product launched in January 2026, ties coverage continuity directly to current documentation: let it lapse, and coverage lapses with it.

The Coverage Gap Is Already Opening

Standard Policies Are Being Rewritten To Exclude AI Entirely

The Insurance Services Office introduced two new CGL endorsements adopted across the market in early 2026: CG 40 47, which excludes all AI-related bodily injury, property damage, and advertising injury claims from standard coverage, and CG 40 48, a narrower version limited to advertising injury. At least six major carriers, including AIG, WR Berkley, Great American, Hamilton Insurance Group, and Philadelphia Indemnity, have filed their own AI exclusion endorsements. The result is a bifurcated market: clients who can demonstrate governance access affirmative coverage through specialist markets. Clients who cannot are left holding an expanding gap, right as AI-related litigation accelerates.

Sources: Lloyd's Market Association AI Risk Management Survey (April 2026); LMA AI Loss Scenarios Survey Results (January 2026); Armilla AI / Chaucer Group AI Liability Policy (2024–2026); Insurance Services Office CGL endorsements CG 40 47 & CG 40 48 (2026); EU AI Act Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.

The Governance-Coverage Linkage

What Underwriters Require Maps Almost Perfectly To What The EU AI Act Demands

What Lloyd's Underwriters Require EU AI Act Article
Documented AI governance frameworks Article 17, Quality management systems
AI model performance monitoring Article 9, Risk management systems
Human oversight mechanisms Article 14, Human oversight measures
Third-party and vendor AI risk management Article 28, Obligations of deployers
Bias and fairness testing documentation Article 10, Data governance and management
Incident logging and reporting Article 73, Reporting of serious incidents
AI Law Tracker

The Law Changed Last Week.
Did Your Client's Policy?

The AI Law Tracker monitors state, federal, and international AI legislation in real time, mapped to what it means for workforce decisions, vendor contracts, and governance gaps. Built for the advisor who cannot afford to be the last one to know before an underwriter asks.

40+ Laws Tracked
11 Active Requirements
6 States Covered
Open the Tracker
Verified against primary sources
Who This Is For

Four Roles, One Blind Spot

Outside of specialty D&O and EPLI lines, most people in these roles have never been asked to think about AI governance. That gap is closing fast.

01

Retail Brokers

Fielding renewal conversations where a client's AI use is suddenly relevant to their coverage, and no framework for having that conversation.

02

Independent Agents

Advising commercial clients across hiring, HR, and operations tools without a way to flag where AI governance gaps are creating uninsurable exposure.

03

Underwriters

Outside of D&O and EPLI specialists, most underwriters have not yet built AI governance into how they evaluate risk. That is changing this year.

04

MGA Groups

Building underwriting appetite and client guidance for a risk category that barely existed two years ago and is now a stated market priority.

How We Help

Practical Governance Readiness, Not A Compliance Lecture

You do not need to become an AI engineer. You need a working knowledge of what governance-ready looks like, and a way to bring that to your clients with confidence.

Client Governance-Readiness Workshops

Sessions your team can bring directly to commercial clients to walk through what an underwriter will expect to see.

Agency Team Training

Equip brokers, agents, and account managers to recognize AI governance exposure during renewal and new-business conversations.

SimpliFocus™ Governance Walkthroughs

A guided introduction to the 12-step governance system your clients can build a program around.

Client Education Toolkits

Playbooks and one-pagers your agency can put in front of clients without building the content from scratch.

Speaking & Conference Sessions

Keynotes and breakouts for agency conferences, MGA summits, and carrier producer meetings on the governance-coverage link.

Advisory Sessions

Direct consultation for underwriting and MGA teams building AI risk appetite and client guidance from the ground up.

Insurance Industry Experience

Built On Insurance, Risk, And Underwriting Judgment

Margaret Spence

Margaret Spence understands the insurance sector from inside it. Her background includes work as an insurance adjuster, agent, insurance leader, and risk manager, combined with deep HR, workplace risk, and employment practices experience. $495 million in settled workplace claims. A $95 million single-client risk portfolio. She recently spoke for APCIA on Underwriting Insurance HR 2030. She is not translating AI governance into insurance language for the first time on this page. She has been bringing insurance judgment into governance work for years.

Organizations We've Worked With
Marsh, insurance brokerage and risk management firm Selective Insurance, property and casualty insurance carrier AIG, global insurance carrier AssuredPartners, insurance brokerage PMA Companies, insurance and risk management The Hartford, insurance carrier Markel, specialty insurance carrier
Let's Talk

Let's Talk About Your Book Of Business

Tell us what you're seeing with clients, renewals, or underwriting appetite around AI. We'll help identify the right starting point, whether that's a workshop, a toolkit, or a conversation about copies of the book for your team.

Every inquiry gets a response from Margaret's team, not a queue.

Form fields are staged for a HubSpot embed. Replace this block with the live embed code when ready.